The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given graph depicts how many tourists visiting MET, Edo and National from the year 2000 to 2005.
In general, what stands out from the graph is that there were considerable upward trends in the number of visitors to MET and National, while the tourists of Edo saw a substantial fall over a five-year period. Another interesting point is that Edo was the most popular museum in 2000 and 2001, but in 2005 National in China attracted more visitors than the others.
In 2000, there were 12 millions of visitors to MET; however, this figure halved in the year 2001 and 2002. During the last three years, MET gained its popularity and became the second famous museum in 2005. In terms of National in China, the annual visitors of this museum rose significantly over the five-year period and reached the peak of nearly 16 million people in 2005.
The number of tourists came to Edo remained unchanged in the year 2000 and 2001. Nevertheless, the two-year period from 2002 to 2003 witnessed a sharp decline in the annual visitors of this museum. Although a recovery was observed in the last two years, there were just 10 million visitors to Edo in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | Dua5 | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | Sadullayev Nodirbek | 82 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | lethaianh | 87 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | lethaianh | 55 | view |
- People have different views on how to reduce traffic congestion Some think that governments should build more train and subway lines while others think that building more roads and widening existing roads will reduce traffic congestion Discuss both views 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 84
- percentage of tourists to scotland who visited different attractions 11
- the society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves as no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 84
- Describe the process of fish canning 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '12 million'.
Suggestion: 12 million
...s than the others. In 2000, there were 12 millions of visitors to MET; however, this figure h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, second, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 956.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73267326733 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40638874529 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1808091094 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.222222222 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173437140183 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841146346125 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183872472235 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119726573005 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0140727837503 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.