Demand for gas and oil is increasing and so finding new sources in remote and untouched areas is a necessity.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
In this contemporary era, the demand for fossil fuels is constantly rising, due to the need for gasoline and crude oil new resources are mandatory to locate. I think that the need for new materials brings more difficulties to the environment compared to any pros it might bring.
To begin with, one of the main pros to locating fresh resources is that it fills the need of people. To explain, numerous factories are run on fossil fuels to produce new machines such as agricultural equipment and generator. In addition, due to the continuous discovery of natural resources, city life is not disturbing. For instance, oil and gas provide cooking gas and transport facilities which are mainly used by individuals daily. Consequently, people do not worry about their conveniences.
However, there are myriad cons to finding new resources. First of all, it spoils the environment and natural habitat. To elaborate, when digging equipment used the find sources, it impacts the surroundings like flora and fauna. Secondly, it creates hazardous circumstances between the two countries. For example, the crude oil found on the border of Russia and Ukraine. As a result, it brings problems to the nations, and because of this, the chances of war might be increased. Finally, the resources of fossils can lead to environmental issues. In other words, when natural gas and petroleum are increased, people use more vehicles which creates air pollution. Moreover, a company manufactures plastic products that hurl garbage in the river because of this water pollution creates. Therefore, global warming is increasing in the world.
In recapitulation, although the resources of fossils bring multiple benefits, the drawbacks are more in comparison. I deem that, in the future, it will necessary for people to use alternatives instead of petroleum, gasoline, and crude oil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-21 | minato3301 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | jay1451 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Jaswinder lal | 61 | view |
- Some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works of arts by using a computer Do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- Many people decide on a career early in their lives and keep to it This they argue leads to a more satisfying working life To what extent do you agree with this view What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life 73
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam how true do you think this statement is what measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 73
- The world has seen an enormous increase in flights for leisure business and commercial purposes around the world over recent years What do you think are the main advantages and disadvantages of such flights Do you think flights should be taxed more 73
- Some people consider price as most important thing to buy product such as cell phone or service e g medical treatment Do you agree or disagree 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28282828283 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97834239401 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1011227663 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.5789473684 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6315789474 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5263157895 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189487147263 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492639153302 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505462068327 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111111852649 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041907242994 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.