With development of media online there is no future for radio.
Amidst of technological advancement in mobile and internet, debate whether radio will be extinct or not is quiet relevant. As a result, many experts in this field claim that we will never see radio being used as means of communication in future. I mostly agree with this contention and argue that radio is likely to be extinct with some condition that internet technology should be universal and their quality should be standard enough to replace radio as major source of communication in some parts of world.
Admittedly, in some scenarios, radio has still remained best way of communication despite rise in mass media and internet. Particularly in poor countries, such as African and some of Asian nations, the source of entertainment and communication has been radio because infrastructure has not been developed in these countries to sustain TV and internet medium. As people are meager, they are unable to invest in technological gadgets which enables them to access internet. So, being cheapest medium for them, radio has dominated in these countries. However, if quality of life of these public can be improved then it is possible that mobile and laptop supercede radio as major device for the communication. Similarly, radio technology is still popular in many areas such as military, navigations and airplane as it is safest and cheapest mode for comunicating. Nonetheless, in future, online media can replace radio in aforementioned department when online technology is improved so that it becomes cheaper and efficent.
However, in most of the cases, internet and mass media has made radio non-existence as all the functions of radio are already present online. Not only this, there are additional features which radio fails to provide. For instance, the people who used radio for listening news now opt youtube and online portal as they have many many additional features which people can enjoy. Likewise, people who used radio for listening music now choose mobile internet or youtube because they can actually listen as well as watch the video. This feature is not present in radio. With the same token, radio podcast listeners have switched to internet podcasts as they do not have to wait for the program to stream in internet. They can listen it anywhere and at anytime.
In conclusion, the topic is debatable and there are no easy answers what future holds for radio. However, analysing logically, radio will cease to exist if quality of internet is improved all over the world. With current advancement it seems likely to happen. This is because all the positive aspects of radio like news broadcast, podcasts and music are present in internet with additional facilities which is most likely cause that radio becomes, at best, superfluous and, at worst, extinct.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Thục Anh | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Thục Anh | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | Brijen | 95 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | bishalpokharel325 | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | bishalpokharel325 | 89 | view |
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both views 61
- Marketing and promotion is the key to a successful business.To what extent do you agree? 73
- With development of media online, there is no future for radio. 73
- Marketing and promotion is the key to a successful business.To what extent do you agree? 71
- Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.Discuss both views 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...io being used as means of communication in future. I mostly agree with this contention an...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 48, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'remained the best'.
Suggestion: remained the best
...dly, in some scenarios, radio has still remained best way of communication despite rise in ma...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 476, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'being the cheapest'.
Suggestion: being the cheapest
...ch enables them to access internet. So, being cheapest medium for them, radio has dominated in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 873, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...est mode for comunicating. Nonetheless, in future, online media can replace radio in afor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: many
... youtube and online portal as they have many many additional features which people can en...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 494, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st, superfluous and, at worst, extinct.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, similarly, so, still, then, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2343.0 1615.20841683 145% => OK
No of words: 454.0 315.596192385 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16079295154 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76953891915 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477973568282 0.561755894193 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 761.4 506.74238477 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1715289753 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.619047619 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335912751544 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997658180148 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603377244802 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195757216291 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478739201736 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.