Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Other, however believe technology is the way to solve these problems
Nowadays, growing of technology is causing diverse environmental problems. While I accept that people need to live simpler lives to tackle the environmental problems, I would agree that technology can cope with these problems.
One the one hand, there are some important reasons why we should live easier. The first reason, human activities is a major in the rise of the greenhouse effect. For example, people are using more and more cars, which contaminate environment by carbon discharging into environment. So, instead of driving cars, we should take public transit, carpool or ride a bicycle. The second reason, the people’s will and behaviors have critical influence on a government’s policies and company’s strategies. For example, if everyone says no to plastic shopping, bag and paper cup, the companies that manufacture such products will switch to environment-friendly products.
One the other hand, I believe that advantaged technology can solve environmental problems. Technology progress, which allows people can research and find renewable energies such wind, hydro, water and solar power. For example, solar water heater inventing – an eco-friendly product not only solve depleting natural resources but also protects our environment. So, the government should invest in these renewable energies. In addition, people make the most of new technology to improve productivity. For example, my motorbike is a fuel-efficient vehicle, and it was produced basing on high-technology.
In conclusion, beside of humans should live simpler, I believe that technology also contribute significantly to solving environmental problems.
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems. Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems. Other, however believe technology is the way to solve these problems 56
- Some people think there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. 22
- Some people think there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 41.998997996 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80327868852 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35972598094 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5678778349 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.389195990491 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12709435806 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149947090668 0.0667982634062 224% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287080270995 0.151304729494 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145774194881 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.