Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees do. Some people believe it is necessary, but others think that it is unfair. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
The issue of whether people such as directors should be paid higher than ordinary employees is a matter of debate. While some believe that this is essential, some argue that this a discrimination. In this essay, I will examine both sides of the argument and offer my perspectives.
On the one hand, people such as directors often have more experience and necessary skills to ensure that the companies operate sufficiently. In addition, they also have to organize teams, enhance collaborations between groups and encourage staff to peak work productivity. Moreover, they also take responsibility for important strategies and plans. Consequently, making a major contribution to the company and being able to help the company get through tough times. In my opinion, they should earn higher salaries than ordinary employees.
On the other hand, there are reasons why people think this policy is unfair. Firstly is that not all directors are capable of that position, however, still earning a large sum of money. This is a serious bias when compared to other employees, particularly with people who are hardworking. Secondly, there are many employees who dedicate their efforts solely to their jobs and might make significant progress in the future. As a result, companies should pay salaries based on the potential values that their staff could bring to them instead of looking at their positions.
In conclusion, It is crucial to pay directors higher than other employees due to their significant dedication and the values that they bring to the company. However, companies should ensure that their directors deserve the salaries they earn, therefore building trust among their staff. Furthermore, employees should be paid based on their contribution, effort, talent, and other potential factors to create an equal work environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | Kha Linh | 89 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | minh phương phạm hồng | 73 | view |
- Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018 61
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the consumption of three basic foods rice wheat and maize by people in four different countries 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th people who are hardworking. Secondly, there are many employees who dedicate th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34948096886 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87638798411 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567474048443 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0100428418 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0625 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.25 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244747772883 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080932521672 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675953989376 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145623551649 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0223626672323 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.