Driverless cars
In near future, most transportation media will operate without drivers and only commuters going to be inside while travelling to their destinations. In this essay I will look at both advantages and disadvantages, but in my opinion, I strongly believe that the benefits overweigh the risks.
One of the significant disadvantages is that there will be higher unemployment rate with in a community. While developed countries might be able to tackle this issue by formulating new job opportunities it is unlikely poor and developing countries to cope this with same extent. Higher unemployment with unskilled workers will put additional burden on countries economy by increasing dependent population who seek for assistance from the government. Spending on uplifting lives will reduce the amount to be spent on development projects hence their financial statuses going to affect further as a nation. For example, significant number of working force in Sri Lanka has become trishaw drivers so that it is the sole income for their families and losing their jobs is a disaster.
On the other hand we can avoid major accidents by using driverless vehicles. Human error cannot be completely eradicated even with the best of hands. In addition consumption of alcohol and other sedating agents will clearly affect the judgemental capacity of individual driver hence become more prone to further mishaps. However, driverless vehicles will be process through major technical advancements, so that it is unlikely to come across with tragedy. For instance, Japan is maintaining driverless bullet trains for decades without major accidents.
In conclusion, it is inevitable that modes of transportation will embrace the latest technology more and more, which might cause new problems like higher unemployment rates especially in developing nations, in my opinion, I really feel avoiding major accidents in roads through ultramodern technology is more beneficial than presumed disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-29 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-11 | tsln7607 | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 89 | view |
| 2023-10-02 | Molla Md Rezaul Karim | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
- A friend of yours is thinking about applying for the same course that you did at a universtiy 73
- In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless Give the advantages and disadvantages 89
- The diagram shows the manufacturing process for making sugar 78
- The diagram shows the process of plastic bottle recycling 61
- in many countries today crime novels and Tv crime dramas are becoming more and more popular Why do you think these books and TV shows are popular What is your opinion of crime friction and TV crime dramas 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...d workers will put additional burden on countries economy by increasing dependent populat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s and losing their jobs is a disaster. On the other hand we can avoid major acc...
^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...dicated even with the best of hands. In addition consumption of alcohol and other sedati...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, really, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56765676568 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07750776378 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613861386139 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.8354864464 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0563325627765 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0269827350338 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496170206307 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336434673375 0.151304729494 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0582721947713 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.