In the future all cars buses and trucks will be driverless The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers Do you think that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

In the future, all cars, buses and trucks will be driverless. The only people travelling inside these vehicles will be passengers. Do you think that the advantages of driverless vehicles outweigh the disadvantages?

A large number of predictions express that there will be no roles for human to be drivers in future vehicles. Despite some threats that the passengers would deal with, I firmly hold the view that the disadvantageous factors of those modes of travel are pale in comparison with the beneficial ones.
On the first hand, the appearance of monotonous vehicles is the major cause of public concerns, chief of which is the worries surrounding to the technological malfunctions. From a mechanical perspective, no matter how advanced the driverless cars are, they stand a chance of breakdown, and the possibility is even greater when it comes to the ones without supervision of professional mechanics. In particular, if a vehicle suddenly stops working when running in motorway, a major accident is prone to be occurred, costing lives of dozens of innocents. Furthermore, let alone the mechanical faults, robotic vehicles may also carry an element of risk. For instance, when a passenger has a heart attack, human drivers can be aware of the incident sooner, and come up with solutions quicker such as change the route to the nearest hospital; nonetheless, it is unthinkable for automatic cars to follow that procedure. In this sense, the lives of aforementioned passengers would be at life-threatening risk.
On the other hand, although robotic vehicles can affect detrimentally to the well-being of the passengers, I believe that the benefits that humankind derive from non-driver vehicles are of greater significance. One obvious advantageous aspect is that the automatic means of transport serve user with more professional methods. As a matter of fact, people can easily be physically and mentally exhausted while driving long hours and usually need a break; however, the robotic counterparts can travel such long distance without fatigue. Therefore, with driverless vehicles, passengers can get to their destinations earlier. Another alarming problem that self-driving cars could encounter is the accidents associated with drivers under influence. Nowadays, many tragic accidents result from drunk-driving, yet this never happens with driverless vehicles. Hence, this means of transport should be approved on safety grounds.
In conclusion, in spite of unwanted repercussions which are attributable to the automatic car, there are several compelling reasons for its widespread use. From my perspective, the drawbacks are outweighed by the merits offered by those means of travel.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-11 tsln7607 89 view
Essays by user tsln7607 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
A large number of predictions express that there will be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this means' or 'those means'?
Suggestion: this means; those means
...are outweighed by the merits offered by those means of travel.
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, such as, as a matter of fact, in spite of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2100.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48302872063 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15202328174 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590078328982 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1618568381 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.529411765 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5294117647 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8235294118 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246291577956 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691056396426 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385469199591 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134384096622 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456087979186 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.