Due to human activities on land and in the sea, he animals are becoming extinct. What are the reasons and Solutions?
Currently, many of animal species are become endanger, in bold terrestrial and coastal areas. This is mainly caused by the increasing number of people eating fish and the development of housing areas. Therefore fish extensive farming and establishment of vertical housing are the practically implemented solution to solve those issue.
Two ways of human activities distributing animal habitats in the land on sea are the demand of fish consumption and shelters. As fish is well-known for its high protein contents, more people seem to be considered to consume fish regularly in the great amount. This gives rise to the number of people eating fish move healthily as well as living longer. The more people live longer, the more houses they need. The Japanese citizen’s favourite food is fresh fish, In 2019, and also a significant rise of old citizen in Japan to 60% as well as the number of residential area, as a result of those reason the people need more perfectly suitable sectors to build their comfort residence, owing to aggressive reclamation.
What can be done to tackle these issue? Two major effective solutions are to adopt fish extensive farming as well as build vertical residence. The reason for this is to sustain the number of fish in coastal areas as result of fish in coastal areas getting a dramatic decline owing to a significant demand of fish consumed. What is more, vertical housing is believed to minimise the use of lands led by overpopulation massively requiring more shelters. In developing country the government encourage the citizen to be active fish-breeders. By 2019, a significant increase had been seen in the simultaneously harvesting activity of Gurame fish to 76% in Indonesia, also there were aggressive development of apartment in the residential area to prevent the land scarcity.
To sum up, both of fish consuming and population increasing are the main factor of termination the animal, hence the inclining of apartment development and massive encourage about fish breeding In land area are the effective step to reduce these negative impact.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-05 | Nguyễn Thảo Phương | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | tresna.soaduon | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | tresna.soaduon | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | aulaayubi | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-16 | fajarilyas | 61 | view |
- The differences in wheat exports over three different areas between 1985 and 1990. 73
- The Proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009. 56
- Due to human activities on land and in the sea, he animals are becoming extinct. What are the reasons and Solutions? 73
- One tool to promote products is through advertising campaign. while promotion contains some merits the demerits outweigh the perceived benefits. 73
- Some people believe that following children to make their own choice on everyday matters (such as food, clothes and entertainment) is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes. Other people believe that it is impor 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... and the development of housing areas. Therefore fish extensive farming and establishmen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 723, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gressive development of apartment in the residential area to prevent the land sca...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, therefore, well, in fact, as a result, as well as, to sum up, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18235294118 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94019983785 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508823529412 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.7667193854 49.4020404114 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128716446501 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051572238764 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614125678645 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0752411805534 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.031104062101 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.