Due to the influence of world-wide media such as television and computers, the gap between cultures is narrowing. The introduction of this “global culture” is of great benefit to the world. To what extent do you agree with this viewpoint?
Mass media has developed globally over decades and the distant among cultures is decreased. I personally believe media is a two sided sword and medium such as television, films and music and so on has several benefits to the world, however, it has some drawbacks too.
One advantage of global culture is getting acquainted with other cultures by watching movies or listening to their songs. Films such as “One thousand and one nights” are known to the world. It also introduces ancient history of eastern world or concisely to say Asian world. Similarly, music and language are mingled together and people get attracted to other cultures and want to know more about people living overseas. Take “Gangam Style” song for instance, it increased the fame of Korean culture and many people associate this song with hearing name of Korea. In addition, learning from other cultures through media affects tourism industry. Many become attracted in other countries and plan to visit it.
However, global culture does have disadvantages. The media is in hand of few people and the more wealthier a country or studio is, the more powerful it will be to exert their own belief and opinion. Consequently, the public doesn’t get a balanced and objective view of what is actually going on. Furthermore, the media wants to appeal the widest range of viewers and try to sustain everyone’s satisfaction. For instance, the movie “300” tried to show the baffle between Iran and Greek but in this movie the history was slanted, however it was widely acclaimed by critics and viewers.
At the end I must say that world-wide media can be good or bad, depending on personal consideration and the authority that is delivering cultural things.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-06 | Mohammadsadegh | 71 | view |
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think that it is better to work for different organizations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- University lecturers are now able to put their lectures on the internet for students to read and so the importance of attending face to face lectures has been reduced Do you believe the use of the internet in formal education is a good idea What future ef 57
- Nowadays people spend much more time and money on their appearance than before Do you agree or disagree 72
- Television has had a significant influence on the culture of many societies. To what extent would you say that television has positively or negatively affected the cultural development of your society? 56
- Fast food is now universally in most countries and is becoming increasingly popular. Some feel that is a positive trend, while others do not. What are your opinions in this? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...ture does have disadvantages. The media is in hand of few people and the more weal...
^^
Line 5, column 93, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'wealthier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: wealthier
... media is in hand of few people and the more wealthier a country or studio is, the more powerf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, similarly, so, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1637630662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84635935628 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616724738676 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9568879026 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.06666666667 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320824021676 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0966864822774 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533980462901 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175959095148 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479258563305 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.