In recent times, economic growth has helped many become richer, both in
developed and developing countries. However, those in developed countries are
not as happy as they were in the past. Why is this? What can be learned from this?
Although economic growth has contributed to increase the number of rich people in both developing and developed countries, people in developed countries feel as not satisfied with their life as they did in the past. It is caused by many reasons and also provide us many valuable lessons. I will give my viewpoints in this essay below.
On the on hand, the economic growth brings beneficial effects on people’s life. Due to the economic development, workers have more potential job opportunities to increase their average income. As the result, the percentage of population becoming rich as the development of economy go up significantly in recent years. One clear example is the hospitality industry which is the new career trend in the last decade. As the income of people rises, people would rather travel and stay in luxury hotels than stay home. Therefore, the annual revenue of hotels increases dramatically and the hoteliers become more and more richer than they did in the past.
On the other hand, rich people are not always feel happy with their achievement. It is true that the higher amount of money successful businessmen earn, the greater pressure they have to work under. For instance, the percentage of Japanese suiciding as working stressfully of Japanese has been grown quickly. The high workload reduce the time spending for social relationships of workers and cause various mental health problems such as anxiety disorder, depression. Therefore, people should balance their career ambition and their life to live more meaningfully.
To sum up, although the economic growth provides people many opportunities to become richer, we should balance between our work and our life to spend time on other social activities and reduce stress in the daily life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-05 | Mollymaul | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | tttran12 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-20 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-10 | trikhung777 | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-19 | phuongchi17899 | 84 | view |
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 2010 73
- The graph below shows the information of communication technology about percentages of people using different devices in the UK between 1998 and 2008
- The education of young people is highly prioritized in many countries However educating adults who cannot write or read is even more important and governments should spend more money on this To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Children do not respect their parents and teachers as much as they did in the past This behaviour is now having a negative impact on society Discuss 89
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...cally and the hoteliers become more and more richer than they did in the past. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20905923345 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73700421532 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567944250871 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8600754018 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212396106094 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603607776162 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077359369302 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138716472013 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106099215978 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'richer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: richer
...cally and the hoteliers become more and more richer than they did in the past. On the o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20905923345 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73700421532 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567944250871 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8600754018 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212396106094 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603607776162 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077359369302 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138716472013 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106099215978 0.056905535591 186% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.