Employers should give their staff at least a 4-week holiday a year to make employees better at their jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Whether businesses' owners should grant their employees a minimum of 4 weeks holiday or not, is a topic of interest among people. I somewhat agree with this view as wage-earners can achieve better work life balance when they are given more holiday time, even though some individuals would overexploit the benefit.
The first reason why I advocate to the increase in the amount of holiday for workers is that it allows people time to recover from work. If people are not given sufficient holidays, they would stand a higher chance of being exhausted and stressed, which are psychological disturbances and associated with many health-related issues. Given the entitlement to minimum 4 weeks of holiday, working people would have adequate time to relax, which relieves them of the burden from their work and private life. This subsequently results in workers' productivity and efficiency enhancement.
Another explanation for my agreement to prolong holiday period for people is that people could have more quality time with family. This is because when people travel, they tend to bring their families with them, which opens up opportunites for these people to get involved in meaningful conversations and strengthen the bonds with each other. By doing so, staff can have a sense of family solidarity and happiness, which implies that they can feel more comfortable and relaxed when coming back to work.
This is not to say that workers can have too many days off and utilize them for their personal purpose. While some workers can make use of their holiday efficiently, others tend to overabuse the allowance of their organizations by taking the time for activities that may have negative impacts on their well-being. For instance, some individuals may use their days off for organising parties instead of recreational activities. These behaviors would not only contradict the good-will of their firms but deteriorate their health.
In sum, by extending the holiday to over 4 weeks, organisational leaders can improve the living standard of their workers and increase their job satisfaction, albeit there are individuals, who may exploit the policy for their own sake. I therefore somewhat side with the idea that workers deserve at least 4 weeks of holiday.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-30 | Ektanarang | 77 | view |
| 2020-05-30 | munmun0905 | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-01 | ZacY | 61 | view |
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 89
- Some people believe that the government should not spend money on international aid when they have their own disadvantaged people like the homeless and unemployed To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviours and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantages 84
- All fathers should be entitled to time off from work when their children are born What is your opinion 73
- Solving environmental problems should be the responsibility of one international organization rather than each national government Do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, at least, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1908.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24175824176 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80173450167 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557692307692 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8147350603 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.2 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2666666667 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216852816496 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793053193739 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629121507527 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132448839609 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690678186184 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.