Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that people may be amused or bothered by advertising and it does not support when they are shopping. Personally, I disagree with the notion because I believe that ads produce certain effects on people's buying behavior whether they are implicit or explicit.
The impacts of advert on consumers may be unclear but people are yet effected by the marketing channel. There are different roles of advertising can play depends on strategy of businesses. To illustrate, some companies want to open new business in other regions or nations, thereby their adverts are often used to promote the company's images including names, logos, or slogan. In this sense, it is not to selling products but introducing their companies is more significant to these firms. Secondly, ads can be used for raising awareness of customer over a certain range of products. Customer may not make the purchase bacause of the content of the ad. However, they will become familiar with the goods or services, thus it could steadily impact their buying behavior which favor the offerings advertised.
By contrast, if there are no advertising campaigns or uneffective ones launched along with merchandise, the sales of them may be impacted. This stems from the fact that buyers tend to avoid commodities and services which are unfamiliar to them. Thus, it would subsequently results in less purchases made by targeted customers. In addition to this, low quality advertising may jeopardises lives of new products or even reputation of organisations. This is especially the case for Hermes, an extravagant fashion brand name, which wrongly depicted the customs of the Chinese people and faced boycott all over the country. Therefore, it is fair to say that the role of decent ads is crutial to the success of firms.
In sum, even though the affects of adverts may not be transparent from patron's angle, they still mitigate or encourage the purchases of people. Besides, reckless marketing programmes would have detrimental impacts on companies. Because of these, it is absurd to think that the marketing tool is useless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-02 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-28 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2022-07-12 | vutamdan | 67 | view |
- Only reason to work hard is to earn money To what extent you do agree or disagree 89
- Interviews form the basic criteria for most large companies However some people think that the interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and that there are other better methods To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Many people think that women should have given the same roles to male in military and police forces Many people think that women are not suitable for this job Discuss both views and give opinions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...roles of advertising can play depends on strategy of businesses. To illustrate, s...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...ar to them. Thus, it would subsequently results in less purchases made by targeted cust...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 284, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun purchases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... Thus, it would subsequently results in less purchases made by targeted customers. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13450292398 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78326328173 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590643274854 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9735281842 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5555555556 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15907450426 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044624874912 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579918292342 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108395342816 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809607174242 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.7 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.