Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What are the major causes of environmental damage? Who are responsible for preventing environmental damage?
Environmental problems have been controversial all over the world in this day and age since climate change, glasshouse effects, and a variant of detrimental impacts that environmental changes have had on humanity. Scientists believe human industrial activities are factors behind these changes, and government should take action in passing laws as well as raising awareness among people to alleviate the unbeneficial transformation of the world.
Since industrialization and urbanization have been prevalent throughout the world, regarded as urgent and indispensable inclinations that humans should reach. However, there are inherent risks that people would have to cope with as industrialization does harm to the surroundings, one of which is the unnecessary changes of the environment. More and more factories have been cropping up everywhere, contributing to large carbon dioxide emissions to the atmosphere. Gradually, it is irrefutable that health is a great concern due to air pollution. Another human activity that blocks the air from being refreshed naturally is illegal deforestation in order to make space for factories and local lodging. The immense loss of forests would spell imminent danger to the world when the air we breathe is no longer fresh, and if taking place everywhere around the world, people will have to find another planet to survive.
Many people blame for governments to be in charge of these effects, but eventually, people themselves should not drag on these vital changes. By healing denuded hills and landscapes through certain campaigns, people can together revitalize the nature of the environment, preventing more habitat loss which is home to a litany of species, including the endangered ones. Governments, on the other hand, ought to have particular regulations penalizing illegal activities to the environment, but also play an important role in providing funds for charities and campaigns to be in active.
In conclusion, humans need to transform our environment into a better and worthwhile living place, not demolish it. Although awareness of the masses can indirectly help dwindle these fatal effects, the government is more powerful to take these into account.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-01 | uyenmia | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-28 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Vivi_peach | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | Vivi_peach | 61 | view |
- The graph below gives the results of a survey showing what 1 000 young people did after leaving school between 2008 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- The charts below show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B 61
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1878.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55621301775 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14273607361 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 585.9 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2611572981 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.461538462 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994831993515 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342475518871 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047069575665 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626281470806 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046558427322 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.