Environmental problem are too big for individual countries and individual people to address We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment is to address it at an international level To what extent do you agree or disagree with thi

Over the past decades, environmental issues are increasing at an alarming rate. Some people believe that these problems are aggrevating continuously and should be addressed to a global platform rather than on an individual level. Is this a solo way to deal with environmensl issues? No, there are many. This essay will argue that individual countries and people can make a huge difference.

On the one hand, those who are in favour of international co-operation says that if massive problems should be taken into consideration by other countries altogether, the recovery rate would be high. Pollutions such as air, soil and noise are deteriorating the quality of life. Air pollution is the major source of global warming which affects the whole world and can not be controlled by a singke country. if developed nations come forward and form a union to help victim countries, it would be beneficial for the world. Indeed, in the past, when Japan face a nuclear attack in 1806, all the nations helped Japan government in order to overcome the severe disaster. Therefore, it is significantly clear that keeping environment ckean and healthy is the responsibilty of every country.

On the other hand, there are several other ways to handle the situation at domestice level. Firstly, individual can play a greater role to contribute in the health of environment. Individuals in the country should cultivate a sense of responsibilty towards the other people and ambience. Because any problem can be solved by unity and will power, people should coke forward to alleviate the problem. They can make small changes in their lifestyle. A good example is to use green transport frequently rather than using cars and motor bikes. It will definitely make a huge difference in amount of air pollution and eventually protect the ozone layer. In addition, government can play a vital role in educating and spreading awarness by conducting programs for people. If government explains the benefits of using public transport, it will attract more people to use public transport. Also, if government imposes stringent laws against pollution, people will be more cautious before making any damage to the environment.

To conclude, this essay argued that although international co-operation can help to alleviate these problems, individuals and government can take some measures to deal with the situation. In my opinion, contribution of both is required in order to make the environment clean and green.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... not be controlled by a singke country. if developed nations come forward and form...
^^
Line 3, column 555, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Japan) must be used with a third-person verb: 'faces'.
Suggestion: faces
... world. Indeed, in the past, when Japan face a nuclear attack in 1806, all the natio...
^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...problems, individuals and government can take some measures to deal with the situ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, in addition, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94448637287 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5525 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2279422118 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.9565217391 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3913043478 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.34782608696 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183808010766 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498389402982 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490023097099 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119642604603 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742195485059 0.056905535591 130% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.