Environmental problems are too big for individual countries and individual people to address. We have reached the stage where the only way to protect the environment to address it at an international level. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Degradation of environment is hot topic today since our world faces many pollutions either in the atmosphere or in the ocean. Protecting the environment is considered too difficult for human being so that the international organization focusing on environment protection should probably take a responsibility to cope with the problem. Personally, I strongly disagree with this statement and I will make it clear in this essay.
To begin with, it can be said that keeping our environment to be stable is every person duty inasmuch as human has a role to protect the world. This means that human should be aware about environmental issues since earth provides us abundant natural resources so that we have to take actions even the smallest actions such as trying to reduce gas emission, recycling waste products and using alternatives energies. Furthermore, joining local non-governmental organizations (NGO) which work on conserving environment is propriate way to make sure our environment being protected. By this, it means that we could participate to prevent the environment and also NGO could make some partnership with local government in order to make program for preventing environment degradations.
It could be accepted that there are several environment degradation cases which cannot handle by individual or local organization so it might be handled at international level. Nevertheless, for preventing action, protecting the environment could be done from the simplest thing like teaching children to recycle or using public transportation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that environmental issues are people’s concern and they can do preventive actions in order to maintain better environment condition. Entering local NGO could be a major advantage for preserving the environment.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-03 | ratunugraheni | 84 | view |
2023-01-18 | Fila | 78 | view |
2021-10-15 | lennie.butera | 70 | view |
2021-02-20 | sifalutfi | 56 | view |
2021-02-20 | sifalutfi | 56 | view |
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000 78
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Doctors recommend that older people do regular exercise However many older people do not take enough What are the reasons for this What can be done to encourage older people to exercise more 61
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55272727273 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31205860929 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.6728424284 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.818181818 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208374611151 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836671783519 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414796068118 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134359207139 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316811884588 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.