A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possession. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important. To what extent you do agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, traditional values like trust, kindness and honour are neglected and individuals are judged by their wealth. Personally, I firmly agree with this statement and this essay will explain why.
Today, it is evident that more and more people try to enhance their social status by collecting glamour items. By obtaining exposure from celebrities and influencers, there are many social values being neglected and replaced by modern standard, since people are eager to copy celebrities’ luxurious life. It means that people’s perception on social standards are changed. For example, in western countries, individuals are assessed by their position in workplace and expensive items. Moreover, life quality improvement is increasing so that people want to full fill their needs in order to level up their social status. By this, it can be said that there are standards which have to follow by them in order that the society could accept them. Because of this, conventional values are less considered as main source on how to behave in society. For instance, in big cities, society tends to judge people by their salary, house and car.
Admittedly, it can be seen that some people still follow traditional values since some old values are still related to current situation and according to them social values such as trust and kindness are worth to be applied. Nevertheless, being rich and having many costly items are not opposed to old social values and people could possibly apply it.
To sum up, I admit that many people leave social values due to fact that it is considered hard to be applied. Dealing with modern society, social status is more important and in order to get that, it could be possibly done by being rich and owning expensive items.
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand agree or disagree 73
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The table below shows the proportions of pupils attending four secondary school types between 2000 and 2009 78
- A lot of places in the world rely on tourism as a main source of income Unfortunately tourism can also be a source of problems if it is not managed correctly Describe the advantages and disadvantages of tourism in the modern world Do you think that benefi 84
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...opposed to old social values and people could possibly apply it. To sum up, I admit that many...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05154639175 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57580711635 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536082474227 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0463277335 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223379942139 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077685492856 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537081633674 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158536578225 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451376442363 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.