Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk global language in the future. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
It is predicted by scientists that universal language will be used in the future across the world. Although it is considered as positive development, it has negative development as well and it probably higher than its positive development.
To start with, those who support this phenomenon admit that language barrier limits communication between people so that one global language is a solution for this problem. By this, it can be said that people would probably communicate freely without limitation of language. In addition, countries’ relations would easily be done inasmuch as people use one language to communicate. For instance, tourists are free to communicate with indigenous so that they could learn more about native culture. Moreover, the students who want to continue their study in abroad would not worry to interact with their friend from other countries and they could deal with the materials which are given to them due to fact that all courses are provided in one language.
By contrasts, it can be said that communicating with global language would possibly cause decreasing of ancient languages. This means that there are several languages such as Navajo, Belarus and Euskara which are endangered since the speakers of these languages are decreasing. If in the future people tried to speak one universal language, it would be harmful for several cultures since ancient languages have strong relation to some cultures. Furthermore, those who oppose the idea of global language argue that it would be drawback since the language’s diversity would be seen unimportant. This means that humanity would lose their identity inasmuch as one language relates to one nation.
In conclusion, it seems for me that this is negative development if we speak one universal language only. Considering the drawbacks, ancient languages and languages’ diversity would possibly disappear due to humanity using one language to communicate.
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- Doctors recommend that older people do regular exercise However many older people do not take enough What are the reasons for this What can be done to encourage older people to exercise more 61
- Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand agree or disagree 73
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers What are reasons behind this Is it positive or negative development 73
- The bar graph below depicts the information about four different transport modes used by people in a European City from 1960 to 2000 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3868852459 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86234578289 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7491079156 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239607070768 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982590090992 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596634989338 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173220156653 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058507897108 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.