Establishing good relationship in the workplace is not important as primary goal of every person is to focus on work To what extent do you agree with this statement

Essay topics:

Establishing good relationship in the workplace is not important, as primary goal of every person is to focus on work.
To what extent do you agree with this statement?

Some demographics of society say that at workplace the primitive goal of employee is to concentrate on his work while establishment of acquaintance with colleagues is not crucial. Although i agree that being productive at workplace is significant, i opine that it is advantageous to have at least a few friends in the workstation.

On the one hand, maintaining good relations with each co-workers in the workstation is not possible for human nature. As there is a variety of personalities in a workplace so it not possible for one to maintain good relations with all co-worker even if they are irretate him. Moreover, a good friendship also consists emotional attachment and it demands some sacrifices; consequently, it would not lead to big group of friends.

On the other hand, having good friendship at the office is tend to productive work. As if colleagues are comfortable with eachother, they would share their ideas effectively which may be produced new innovative ideas. It not only favour the fortunate future of that office but also make the office environment vibrant. To exemplify it, in multinational companies group meetings are held before making any decisions these meetings become fruitful only then if co-workers are familiar with eachother otherwise they may be oppose eachother intentionally.

Conclusively, there should be a healthy balance between being productive at work and forming social bond. It is convenient to find friends at place of work, but not at the cost of our own productivity.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-08-10 swasthani 61 view
2021-07-13 sssssse 63 view
2021-03-28 kmohaman 56 view
2021-03-16 fowzan 78 view
2020-07-24 katenokk84 78 view
Essays by user kmohaman :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...with colleagues is not crucial Although i agree that being productive at workplac...
^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... productive at workplace is significant i opine that it is advantageous to have a...
^
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...having good friendship at the office is tend to productive work As if colleagues are...
^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...ideas effectively which may be produced new innovative ideas It not only favour the fortunate ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, then, while, at least, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12653061224 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10070862909 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555102040816 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 245.0 20.2975951904 1207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1256.0 106.682146367 1177% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 245.0 20.7667163134 1180% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 88.0 7.06120827912 1246% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144896222848 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144896222848 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875439737719 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436168112938 0.056905535591 77% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 125.2 13.0946893788 956% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -185.66 50.2224549098 -370% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 100.0 11.3001002004 885% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.95 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.53 8.58950901804 227% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 9.78957915832 572% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 100.0 10.1190380762 988% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 100.0 10.7795591182 928% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.