Even though people read the news using the internet nowadays, newspapers still are an important source of information for the general public/the majority of people. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
The appearance of the Internet after the third Industrial Revolution changed the possible approach to the latest news. While I agree that reading the news on the Internet has its advances, I believe that it will never replace newspapers.
Admittedly, reading the news using the Internet is an appealing way to get information for its incomparable convenience and high efficiency. People have no longer been restricted by the location and time to read the news. For example, with a smartphone, people can keep up with the latest news even while walking. Meanwhile, news is available once it has been uploaded on the Internet; there is no need to wait until newspapers are being published any more.
Nevertheless, the traditional information media, newspapers, has already existed for over hundreds of years, which proves its unique values. It has been an irreplaceable habit for adults and older people to read newspapers every day. In the past, people had no choice but to buy newspapers to get the latest news, because it was the only media that transmitted messages and information. Therefore, reading newspapers has become an essential part of a daily routine, which cannot be easily replaced by new media. Meanwhile, newspapers are more convenient for older people who cannot figure out how to use sophisticated modern technologies like computers and smartphones. A quick flick on the latest newspapers is all it takes to get the newest information. At the same time, a series of operations, such as clicks, importing, searching, will become a considerable challenge for the aged.
In conclusion, although reading the news on the Internet has gained popularity in recent years, I believe that new media will never replace newspapers because it has become a habit for many and could fulfil the individual needs of older people.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that money would do better on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that women should play an equal role as men in a country s police force or military force while others think women are not suitable for these kinds of jobs Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Newspapers are having enormous influence on people s ideas and opinions Why is this the case Is is a positive or negative development 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, nevertheless, so, therefore, third, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18120805369 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94047824746 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553691275168 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9905601106 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299635274831 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109111254245 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590363711623 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180904777375 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752127717375 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.