In this contemporary era, globalization is flourishing in many countries. It has a major contribution to the world's economy through various sectors such as trade, government and politics. Whereas, it has certain negative impacts on the society. An attempt is made here to analyse both the views.
To begin with, globalization influence the economy to a great extent through international trade. In other words, several international companies work in collaboration with each other for manufacturing and producing quality goods and products. Such type of products invite the attention of public and can in turn flourish the business. This type of trade contributes a lot to the economy. To give a clear example, Nutella, is a widely accepted international food product whose ingredients are supplied by different nations. This brand constitutes almost 30 percent of world economy.
On the other hand, as the world economy is contributed by different countries, there would be an increased chance for disputes between the nations. This would even resort to international conflicts which may affect the overall stability of the world. Apart from that, when the borders of the countries are open for everyone, people can easily access different nations without any restriction. This can spread communicable diseases easily to other countries. Outbreak of diseases to a large population would be difficult to control.
Finally, globalization can cause cultural transmission. When people from one country move to other, it paves the way to the blending of different cultures. Thus, the identity of a country can be easily lost.
To recapitulate, as a coin have 2 sides, globalization also have its benefits and negatives. Globalization facilitates easy movement of people from one country to another for education, trade and occupation. Therefore, the contribution of globalisation in world's economy downplay its negatives such as cultural blending and spread of communicable diseases.
- Some people think that spending a lot on birthday celebrations and wedding is a waste of money.But others think that it is important to young people and the society.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people prefer to live in small family units, while others think it is better to live in large family groups. Discuss both of views and give your opinion. 73
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.To what extent is this a positive or a negative development? 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and vie your own opinion. 73
- Freshwater has always been a limited resource in some parts of the world. Today, however, growing worldwide demand has made this a global problem. What causes of the increased demand, and what measures can governments and individuals take to respond to th 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ies. It has a major contribution to the worlds economy through various sectors such as...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...such as trade, government and politics. Whereas, it has certain negative impacts on the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... contribution of globalisation in worlds economy downplay its negatives such as c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, may, so, therefore, thus, whereas, apart from, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19024005036 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569078947368 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2904758598 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.0 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4761904762 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134062418707 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395693934954 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328514665934 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795014687131 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338935510132 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.2 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.