Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is often argued that taxes which is used to help the state schools should not be a requirement for parents whose infants go to private educational places. I completely disagree with that statement because this supportive system is crucially necessary for family and their children, who are living in poverty, giving them countless opportunities to get free education.
Firstly, it is an indisputable fact that being educated person is the most vital process in one's live. I personally believe that all young generations whoever they are, have a right to study at academic places which can guarantee pupils to achieve their goals in the future. Unfortunately, not everyone can afford to have education in these locations therefore they have no any chances except for opting the governmental learning centres. This means that by the help of the payment obtained from the upper class community, the poor have a great chance to have a free study at state schools. For instance, European countries have both private and governmental schools and residents can choose one of them in accordance with their financial budgets. As a consequence of this optional choice in education process, every person can find their position on their way of lives.
Secondly, it is vitally important to note that the major resource of obtaining a huge amount of money for authority to control the community is people themselves. This can lead to circulation of currency. Giving more detailed explanation, for instance, families who are capable of sending their children to private schools pay for taxes then these gathered amounts are paid for employees in state places.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirmed my position that taxes ought to be taken from families who can provide their children with private education to support governmental schools.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | quyt.72 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | hieu13092006 | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | anyway6721 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-12 | thanhtu000 | 61 | view |
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year
- The two types of figures table and pie chart illustrate four main reasons caused land degradation regionally and nationwide
- The maps give information about an island which has experienced a constructional developments for its tourists 78
- The figures illustrate the statistics about usage of water in Oceania in the year of 2004 100
- The bar chart illustrates the statistics about households in owned and rented accommodation in UK from 1918 to 2011 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... in these locations therefore they have no any chances except for opting the gover...
^^
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ee study at state schools. For instance, European countries have both private and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, except for, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79892888831 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7253899036 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.666666667 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.83333333333 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3316700886 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115338222993 0.084324248473 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0954210138489 0.0667982634062 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232403345836 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994998544939 0.056905535591 175% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.