It is true that fossil fuel plays a significant role in the growth of nations. However, I totally agree with the viewpoint that we should exploit green energy as a long-term solution to protect the environment.
To begin with, using renewable energy offers sustainable development for many counties. Due to the fact, the shortage of fossil fuel is not the only issue of the individual country but also the problem of the whole world. Only by harnessing the renewable energies such as wind, hydro and solar power can governments deal with this issue successfully. For instance, various countries generate electricity production from wind, hydro and solar power can governments deal with this dilemma effectively. For example, various countries generate electricity production from wind, especially the Netherlands is one of the world’s largest offshore wind farms with 150 turbines land. The problem seems to be that it takes money to develop new technologies, it is worth it in long run.
Dependence on mineral fuels has serious impacts on the environment. First of all, it discharges emission of carbon dioxide and many other harmful gases into the atmosphere which blames for climate change and global warming. Moreover, those issues eventually lead to many natural disasters like acid rain, droughts, and floods. In contrast, using solar power is environment- friendly substitutes in order to fight climate change. All in all, it is apparent that mineral fuels not only contribute to pollution environment but also increase the number of storms.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that we should prioritize use renewable energy to decline direct effects on the earth.
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 67
- Nowadays not enough students choose science subjects in university in many countries What are the reasons for this problem What are the effects on the society 96
- Nowadays most people wear western clothes rather than their traditional clothes What are the reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 65
- Nowadays most people wear western clothes rather than their traditional clothes What are the reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 76
- Nowadays most people wear western clothes rather than their traditional clothes. What are the reasons for it? Is it a positive or negative development? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, first of all, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34716981132 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83067668749 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1299904834 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.214285714 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5714285714 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.092803052114 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365528328487 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318662365565 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576712222528 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125236828543 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.