Fossil fuels (e.g. coal, oil and natural gas) are the main resource of energy in many countries. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy (e.g. wind power and solar power) is encouraged). To what extent is this a positive or negative development?
Fossil fuels have been used mainly in most countries around the world. However, for many reasons, at present, governments have been investing in developing alternative sources of fuel such as solar, wind and water. In my opinion, this is definitely positive development in these days.
Firstly, we are able to easily recognize the rapid growth of the world's population. In 2011, the world population reached 7 billion and after 8 years, this number is predicted 8 billion. Therefore, there is no argument that humans need a constant amount of fuel in this operation. Meanwhile, fossil fuel source has been took a very long time to form but very quickly will be exploited to provide to the growing demand of humans. Thus, the development of alternative fuel sources, in the long run, becomes more urgent than ever.
Secondly, the exploitation of fossil fuels to supply energy worldwide will cause widespread environmental degradation. For example, burning fuels causes greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants, leading to many consequences for human health. Meanwhile, the use of solar energy or wind and water has not yet shown results that cause environmental pollution. In addition, in the long time, this source of energy will be provided with cheaper costs because they are renewable, although the initial investment cost can be very high.
In conclusion, with the above-mentioned issues, I believe that the development of alternative fossil fuels is completely positive and an urgent issue for governments around the world. Only by following this approach could a better scenario for the world be ensured
- Everyone should stay at school until 18. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Living in large cities is more and more difficult. What are the problems faced by those who live in big cities? Suggest some measure to solve these problems. 84
- Blockchain apply for coffee supply chain 78
- In some countries, children are becoming overweight and unhealthy. What are the cause and solution for this? 89
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today.Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies. Others, however, think that music can have a negative influence on both.Discuss both these views and give your 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...asily recognize the rapid growth of the worlds population. In 2011, the world populati...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... after 8 years, this number is predicted 8 billion. Therefore, there is no argume...
^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
... Meanwhile, fossil fuel source has been took a very long time to form but very quick...
^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ternative fuel sources, in the long run, becomes more urgent than ever. Secondl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28682170543 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89151443327 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7868142977 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241009677626 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814508945013 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512733168618 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14719322541 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634771352276 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.