An increasing number of people are now using the Internet to meet new people and socialize. Some people think this has brought people closer together while others think people are becoming more isolated. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
In recent years, the Internet has had a huge impact on the way people communicate. There is considered an upward trend in the number of people who are using the Internet to make new friends. Many believe that online communication can bond people together whilst others think that this is able to make people become isolated. In this essay, I will discuss both these sides and argue why the Internet has affected negatively human’s lives.
To start with, more and more people are now using several social platforms to broaden their social circles. Accordingly, this assists users to get access and connect with others more easily. For instance, the most popular social networking site, which is frequently used by young teenagers, is Facebook. Indeed, Facebook users can meet new friends from around the world without limits on time and places. Therefore, using social media is the most convenient way to meet new people. However, people are at risk of losing their real-life relationships when using these technologies in the wrong ways.
On the contrary, although using the Internet to make new friends can bring people a great number of benefits, it would make users become dependent on these modern technologies. Indeed, people can become more isolated and addicted to social media. Consequently, they will be able to lose their connection with their real worlds and be deepened into virtual life. That leads to the fact that they will become solitary from their family and significant others.
To conclude, there are more people who are now taking advantage of the Internet to socialize with friends. Some people are of the opinion that this way of communication has brought people together while others believe this can lead to isolation in some people. In the individual term, I believe that using the Internet to make friends is detrimental to users if they use it for a long period of time.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-27 | Selena17_ | 61 | view |
2023-03-05 | tergeo | 80 | view |
2021-09-22 | Lê Thuỳ Dương | 56 | view |
2021-02-03 | almitra shastri | 85 | view |
2020-08-25 | annarosie2411 | 66 | view |
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Surgery products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people consider price as most important thing to consider when buying a product or service Do you agree or disagree 73
- Modern societies need specialists in certain fields but not in others Some people therefore think that governments should pay university fees for students who study subjects that are needed by society Those who choose to study less relevant subjects shoul 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 386, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ntal to users if they use it for a long period of time.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04416403785 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53800732015 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511041009464 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.0118518138 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0588235294 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484734233753 0.244688304435 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159935298279 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121006765736 0.0667982634062 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.320853892204 0.151304729494 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106925935199 0.056905535591 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.