It is a common argument often debated that the government's investment in the fields of arts, music and theatre and that, this investment would be useful if spent on things like public services. Although I agree that the government should spend more on public services, I also feel that investing in the arts, the theatre isn't a waste but actually a boon.
The arts, music and theatre can act as major cultural heritage for a country. Having invested these areas can actually boost the pride of a nation and act as a role model in promoting their native talent. After all, a few years later, it is these aspects which would be looked upon to study about a country or it's culture. Having some notable works the arts and music might even attract foreigners and create an interest in that particular country. For example, the visual medium called anime is solely a product of Japan and now, it is enjoyed and by millions of people all around the world. But at the same time, the government should take care that the public sector isn't neglected while investing in the art.
If anything, it is the people who elected the government which in turn must look after the welfare of the people. So, a significant amount of funding in public services should be provided by the administration. It is the basic duty for any government to satisfy it's people's needs. Creating more jobs, in turn, benefits the country as more people would be employed and be earning. This as a result produces more income to the government itself.
So, I suggest that the government must find a middle ground for the funding of money in both the arts, as well as providing the public services. Otherwise, imbalances would occur which might affect the country in whole.
- The bar chart below shows the US top ten processed food export markets 11
- The government s investment in arts music and theatre is a waste of money Governments should invest these funds in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 67
- For a long time art has been considered an essential part of all cultures in the world However nowadays people s values have changed and we tend to consider science technology and business more important than arts What do you think are the causes of this 78
- The graph below shows the number of trips made by children in one country to travel to school in 1990 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The wealth of a nation is said to depend on the health of its citizens Yet in the modern knowledge based economies of the world education is more and more being seen as the main force in the development of all countries Do you share this view Give reasons 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... common argument often debated that the governments investment in the fields of arts, music...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...that investing in the arts, the theatre isnt a waste but actually a boon. The art...
^^^^
Line 3, column 671, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...should take care that the public sector isnt neglected while investing in the art. ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... the funding of money in both the arts, as well as providing the public services. Otherwis...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, so, well, while, after all, for example, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1439.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71803278689 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45651457431 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537704918033 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1849715393 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318892536301 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100826859839 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878928359518 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18962610778 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0888396786108 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.