The government is spending a lot of money to discover life in other planets Some people think that the government is wasting money and they should spend more money addressing the public problems To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

The government is spending a lot of money to discover life in other planets. Some people think that the government is wasting money and they should spend more money addressing the public problems. To what extent do you agree?

The advent and development of science and technology have allowed us to explore other planets. To some extent, I agree that the government should budget other more serious issues such as global warming, diseases, etc. but I would also argue that space exploration is beneficial for humankind in the longer term.
On the one hand, we are facing pressing problems on the Earth that require our immediate actions rather than building spaceships to explore the Universe. Global warming and climate change are the most outstanding and disturbing subjects which we have not found an effective way to tackle yet. Therefore, it is understandable to argue why governments have to occupy their time and money to find life in other planets whereas our planet is being destroyed every day. Moreover, poverty still remains the biggest enemy in some corners of the World. While many people have to fight that constant battle to have food and to survive, it seems to be a waste of financial resource to fund space exploration projects.
On the other hand, I believe that space research can be valuable for us in a long run. Those programs give us a deeper insight into the Universe and provide us with more valuable information about other life forms. In fact, many outer space explorations have helped us to form a solid knowledge of the Universe. For instance, since Mars expeditions started, humankind has had more understandings about conditions of geology and climate in a faraway planet, which we would have never known without those studies. Furthermore, this is, perhaps, a key to the problem of overpopulation on the Earth. By researching habitability potentials, inhabiting on Mars might be no longer a science-fiction story in the future.
In conclusion, I partly agree that governments should make more endeavours to confront urgent matters such as environment and hunger. However, I believe that searching for life in the cosmos has lifelong benefits for the well-being and prosperity of mankind.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (15 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-03 tammynguyen 81 view
Essays by user tammynguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11620795107 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87201391605 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7860918131 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5625 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6875 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148508249501 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045256071314 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601593350172 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980029742422 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412306217944 0.056905535591 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.