Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
these days many local governments spend large portions of their budget on developing and improving transport's infrastructure. in this regard there is controversial issue that suggests governments should focus more on the railways' development than roads'. although I agree that investment in railways have many benefits, I do think spending reasonable budget on roads is very indispensable to meet public demands.
On the one hand, allocating a significant amount of the government budget on train networks is beneficial for society. governments prefer that the most proportion of society use public transports like trains and subways than cars and buses. if they do so, the significant public problems such as road traffic, air pollution and meager fuel supplies would be solved. it is no surprise then that The Netherlands where most part of the country have been covered by railway networks does not confront these issues.
However, this does not mean that road systems should be completely neglected. people sometimes need to use their personal vehicles to reach their destinations. so it is an incontrovertible right that people have appropriate and safe highways and streets. relevant organizations is responsible to provide these facilities properly, if they not, roads would experience tragic and catastrophic accidents. To illustrate that, a recent study conducted by insurance organizations concluded that most people lose their life in accidents at low standard roads. therefore governments have to set aside sufficient investment to help road development.
To sum up, although there are clear benefits of ensuring a large amount of budget goes into railways, I do not believe spending money on road structure should be overshadowed as this too provides important benefits that would deduce many unpalatable accident to happen.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
these days many local governments spend large...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...nd improving transports infrastructure. in this regard there is controversial issu...
^^
Line 1, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uggests governments should focus more on the railways development than roads. alt...
^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
...s governments should focus more on the railways development than roads. although I agre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...n the railways development than roads. although I agree that investment in railways hav...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 414, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y indispensable to meet public demands. On the one hand, allocating a significan...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...ain networks is beneficial for society. governments prefer that the most proportion of soci...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...trains and subways than cars and buses. if they do so, the significant public prob...
^^
Line 5, column 367, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...d meager fuel supplies would be solved. it is no surprise then that The Netherland...
^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etworks does not confront these issues. However, this does not mean that road sy...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...systems should be completely neglected. people sometimes need to use their personal v...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 100, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pletely neglected. people sometimes need to use their personal vehicles to reach ...
^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...l vehicles to reach their destinations. so it is an incontrovertible right that pe...
^^
Line 9, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... incontrovertible right that people have appropriate and safe highways and street...
^^
Line 9, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Relevant
...ropriate and safe highways and streets. relevant organizations is responsible to provide...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...ife in accidents at low standard roads. therefore governments have to set aside sufficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 556, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: therefore,
...ife in accidents at low standard roads. therefore governments have to set aside sufficien...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5780141844 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0773114209 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620567375887 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.808886492 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.357142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.01903807615 339% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190232343593 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620886368673 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641296359876 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120268842338 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713998092247 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.