he quality of health care a person received should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of health care for all its citizens. To what extent do you agree??
The quality of health care a person received should not depend on the size of their bank balance. The government is responsible for providing a high level of health care for all its citizens. To what extent do you agree??
Providing health service according to economic status would not be appropriate for every human being. The government should be accountable for their citizens to give better health care freely. I completely agree with this statement because it creates an equal opportunity for people of any economic background to cure diseases and mitigates mortality rate.
To begin with, government responsibility towards country residents is crucial for inequality in health treatment. There are millions people out of access of good health facility due to lower financial condition and lack of infrastructure. The government support for those deprived and poor people preserves human right of getting proper health care. For example, in Nepal, hospitals and health centers are not established in remote area of the country and local residents must die if they suffer from serious illnesses such as pneumonia, cancer, and heart attack. Furthermore, people can save some money and use that savings to fulfill other basic human needs.
Secondly, cost free health service prevents people from various kinds of diseases as they can check up regularly and get information about their health condition. As a result, chances of death caused by different illnesses can reduce and average mortality rate gradually decreases. For instance, the treatment for tuberculosis is free in Nepal, due to this fact there is relatively low mortality rate of TB patients than other counterparts. Moreover, the government also benefits from healthy citizens by employing them in different sectors such as agriculture, education, and business.
In conclusion, health service provided by the government insures same chances for people in any economic background as well as alleviates mortality percentage. Thus, the government can get back financial support from country residents as they contribute in other developmental activity.
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suberbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do yu agree or disagree It 61
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from suberbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The chart below shows the movement of people from rural to urban areas in three countries and predictions for future years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- Large businesses have big budgets for marketing and promotion and as a result people gravitate towards buying their products What problem does this cause What can be done to encourage people to buy local products 73
- Every year more and more waste and pollution are created How are common people affected by this trend What can individuals can do to address the situation 47
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51070336391 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88799347598 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581039755352 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0307840021 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2352941176 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.47058823529 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.445404816141 0.244688304435 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159206594099 0.084324248473 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15628056878 0.0667982634062 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308929129132 0.151304729494 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.283888254234 0.056905535591 499% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.