The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real needs of the society in which those products are sold. Do you agree or disagree?.
In this day and age, advertisement is becoming one of the most effective ways for businesses to introduce their products. There is an argument about advertising that its power, not the demand of the society for products are sold, is shown by the high incomes of consumer items. In my opinion, I do not agree with this idea.
People who recommend that the high sales of those things reflect the power of advertising have their own reason. nowaday, there are a lot of famous goods do not meet the requirements of consumers, while they still earn a lot of money for business. It is due to the fact that these products have excellent advertising which is attractive to many people. For example, Apple purchased the Iphone 11 in June 2015, while the Iphone 11s was released 2 months later with very slight developments. It is clear that people do not need to have the latter version while the former is still working effectively, but they are likely to pay more to follow the trend. As a result, Iphones have huge incomes from buying their products every year.
However, I believe that most people buy popular products based on their demand and they are not affected by advertising alone. Indeed, although the advertisements are pretty attractive, not everyone has the ability to purchase them easily. They still have to pay for other aspects of life, such as healthcare or food that they only would like to buy goods that they need. a new car, for example, has safer features, or is more economical to operate. Thus, enhancing their quality of life.
In conclusion, while advertising obviously influences our buying behaviour, I do not agree that people make decisions that go against their real needs.
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some countries spend a lot of money preparing competitors to take part in major competitions such as Olympic Games or football World Cup Some people say that it would be better to spend this money encouraging children to take up sports from a young age To 73
- Some people think that all university students sould study whatever they like Others believe that they shoyld only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology 73
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
- Many countries believe that international tourism has harmful effects Why do they think so What can be done to change their views 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nowaday
...r of advertising have their own reason. nowaday, there are a lot of famous goods do not...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: A
...would like to buy goods that they need. a new car, for example, has safer feature...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84300341297 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60537678885 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576791808874 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5576561369 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262724400747 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795329089022 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745440383696 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150393823241 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0501138831973 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.