Historical objects should be brought back to their country of origin. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Many people believe that historical relics should be returned to the nation which it originally belonged to. I strongly agree to this statement due to how important the value it brings to the culture of one country, as well as, deepening the relationship between countries.
First and foremost is the traditional value it brings to the citizens of countries that these historical subjects are being returned to. As each relic contains a deep and insightful knowledge about the past era, it has an enormous value in studying the past as well as understanding the hardships that our ancestors have to overcome in order to build the very foundation of our society. A letter that is being sent by the emperor of Vietnam to fellow countries can show a tremendous amount of the level of literature, economy or the explanation to events that happened in the past. Consequently, these relics deepen the knowledge of our beginning and enhance the gratefulness for the achievement of previous generations.
Furthermore, it may positively increase the relationships of countries. By finding and learning about the relics that have been hidden, archeologists may learn more about the diverse culture and traditions of each country, and subsequently, may create a motivation in exchanging knowledge. Not only that, returning a relic to the origin country can be see as an act of respect toward the unchangeable traditional value and the history resides in each relic. For instance, many records of film or movies illustrate the assistance of russia toward vietnam during wars has become the symbols of strong friendship to this very day.
In conclusion, historical objects are the irreplaceable part of one nation’s culture and relationship, therefore, should be returned to its country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-17 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | hien3112 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Daniel3003 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | hinhin411 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays people depend on technology for leisure activities Is this a positive or negative development 67
- More and more people today are choosing to eat only healthy food and are making time to exercise regularly Why is this What can be done to encourage other people to eat only healthy food and to make time to exercise regularly 61
- Some people think the money spent on developing the technology for space exploration is not justified There are more beneficial ways to spend this money To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What are the major causes of environmental damage Who is responsible for preventing environmental damage 73
- Many people use social media to get in touch with other people and know about news events Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re, should be returned to its country.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, may, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23776223776 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07154647858 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.9585715074 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.181818182 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111900714404 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047164089027 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037924115809 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0783714541977 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237812766563 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.