An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the
natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
It is true that the natural environment undergoes many bad consequences due to the increase in producing consumer goods. There are several reasons for this case, and there are some solutions that can be forced to solve these problems.
There are several reasons why the environment is damaged by production of goods. First, companies take advantage of the resources of nature in order to create goods. The unlimited exploit can lead to the loss of natural resources. For instance, car plants use coal or fossil fuel so as to create machines or items on a car. This can cause the depletion of this kind of fuel in nature. Second, the increase in producing goods can cause more waste. Specifically, some plants create much more waste during the production, then this waste is dumped into the water, as a result, this will cause pollution for the water environment.
However, we can tackle these problems by some approaches. In terms of citizens, they should be aware of the importance of saving goods. The less demand in goods, the more security that environment can get. When companies realize that people have less demand for their products, chances are, they will limit the production. This can reduce the waste being created and make the natural environment cleaner. Not only that, the government should force the idea of investing in recycling systems. If these kinds of systems become popular, people will decline the use of new products. These actions lead to less pollution for the environment.
In conclusion, the natural environment is damaged by the waste from plants and the exploit of these companies to create more goods. Luckily, the natural environment can avoid being polluted thanks to the awareness of people and strategy from governments.
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 39
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 67
- An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...nce, car plants use coal or fossil fuel so as to create machines or items on a car. This...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, then, as to, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07560137457 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63584859783 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508591065292 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9125296204 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.7368421053 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3157894737 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57894736842 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216808035938 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690227151755 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695354608904 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150270232156 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660786475073 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.