An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
In the modern world, a growth in production of consumer goods leads to the destruction of the natural environment. This situation occurs for numerous reasons. At the same time, there are a lot of solutions for individuals and governments that should be adopted to improve this case.
There are 2 primary reasons that should be mentioned. The first reason comes from the significant increase of populations. Overloaded residents bring about more consumer goods. As a consequence, a huge amount of garbage would cause pollution and destroy the natural environment. Secondly, fast consumption is a popular trend in a rapidly changing world. The circle life of a product is shortened while the demand of humans does not reduce. To respond to these needs, people have to utilize more human resources and natural resources, therefore resource depletion and energy soon becomes a threat.
However, fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem. The first solution would be sustainable production. Governments should issue policies to encourage a combination between using eco-friendly products with resource efficient production methods (such as reducing waste, recycling material, using renewable energy sources). Furthermore, it is essential to raise the perspective of residents. Consumers should be educated about what environmental impacts are caused by their choices. Thus, responsible consumption should be applied that includes buying fewer, focusing on quality items and supporting sustainable brands. Finally, collaboration among all governments, businesses and consumers play an important role in protecting the natural environment. Creating a sustainable society while preserving the environment requires collective effort from all.
All in all, it is clear that there are various reasons for the production of consumer goods that harm nature, and steps for addressing this challenge.
- Fewer young people do farming work in rural areas Why Should young people be encouraged to do farming work 61
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 78
- Task 2 In some countries if people need to find work they have to move away from their families and their friends Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Task 2 As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth What are solutions for these problems 84
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 598, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etion and energy soon becomes a threat. However, fortunately, several measures c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7703180212 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05900143717 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.2657829912 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.9473684211 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8947368421 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233506785618 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589857804796 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502612120971 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143372357931 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494912757001 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.34 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.59 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.