Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
With the considerable progress of urbanisation, more problems are brought to our attention and traffic is always the top-notch topic of all over the world. It is believed that we can increase the petrol’s price to reduce the traffic congestion and environmental problems. This essay will shed light on this topic and explain my viewpoint.
Initially, if the law of rising petrol’s price is carried out , people will lower the terms of using their private cars or motorbikes. Not only will the exhausting fumes from their transportations be lower considerably but also the noise in rush hour will not be able to exist. Therefore, we can particularly solve the air pollution and noise pollution. Besides, this will enhance people’s participation in using eco-friendly transportation such as bicycles or buses. This brings us so many magnificent advantages as long as we can do exercises, keep our body fit or enjoy fresh air.
In many countries, taking part in using public transportation has been one of their most important habits. In Vietnam, public transports have been improving from time to time and using that kind of transportation is a suitable solution beside increasing the price of petrol to reduce traffic jams or environment’s problems. In my opinion, travelling by bus will significantly create unexpectable profits particularly for ourselves and generally for the Earth, which is our beautiful planet. For instance, a bus containing 50 persons will reduce the use of 50 private transportations and the proportion of exhausting fumes will witness a 50-time decrease. Moreover, paying 10 percent of using private car taxes, which will make people lower the consumption of cars or motorcycles, is also a recommendation.
In conclusion, I strongly have the same viewpoint of upgrading the petrol’s price to reduce traffic problems and pollution. Besides, paying more attention to using public transportation and giving taxes to those private cars are effectively both the advantaged solutions.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of rising petrol’s price is carried out , people will lower the terms of using th...
^^
Line 5, column 325, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...traffic jams or environment’s problems. In my opinion, travelling by bus will sign...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39873417722 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25834067074 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560126582278 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.352838801 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.733333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0997412829827 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0390710858389 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410634439438 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725765155699 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254758350455 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.