Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measured do you think might be effective

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.

To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measured do you think might be effective?

Traffic and pollution are one of daily problems and need to be solved urgently. Sadly, nowadays, those problems are becoming more harmful to people. Some people said the best way to tackle this problem is to increase the price of petrol and make people use public transportation. These motions may become a solution, however I strongly disagree about that perspective and more has demerits to people specifically in economical issues. Decreasing the number of private transportation by persuading people to use public transportation and for the government to make some rules to forbid transportation that have more than several years to be used daily.

The way of solving the problems of high traffic and pollution with increasing the price of petrol maybe can be helped. Although those things have a double-edged effect on people. Not only solving but also making another issue, especially in economics. For Instance, daily needs like vegetables, meat, and fish become more pricey. The Machine that produces this material-consuming patrol that has an unusual price.

Though, there is another way to tackle this issue. For the government, they can make some rules to forbid transportation that have more than several years to be used daily. The transportation that has several years of use is becoming dull and bad vehicles. The other is that the government seriously takes good care of the public transportation facilities and makes some campaigns to persuade people to use public transportation. With those not only solving the problem of traffic and pollution, it can help the city reach a good environment.

In conclusion, making a patrol more pricey can help reduce traffic and pollution problems, but there is another good way to end these problems by reducing the number of private transportation with persuading people to use public transportation and for the government to make some rules to forbid transportation that have more than several years to be used daily.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-24 Ahmad_off 61 view
2023-11-21 hanifah 67 view
2023-11-20 Ahmad_off 78 view
2023-11-20 Ahmad_off 73 view
2023-10-16 MinyiChu 61 view
Essays by user hanifah :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 417, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... has demerits to people specifically in economical issues. Decreasing the number of privat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he price of petrol maybe can be helped. Although those things have a double-edged effect...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...g patrol that has an unusual price. Though, there is another way to tackle this is...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23899371069 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03497406911 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427672955975 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.6740543383 49.4020404114 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.06120827912 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142048816741 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638010668777 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756463751741 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109347776465 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478709087596 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.