Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
As matter of the fact, increasing traffic density and pollution have become to the alarming issues contemporary world. In my opinion, it is not the best method and alternative options should be taken to address these issues.
On the one side, if the price of petrol increasing it would make people to use their private vehicles. Not only is this cause to reduce the traffic jam but also, the weather getting cleaner. Because people have more tendency to use public transportation. This is uneconomical to use their own vehicles because of petrol price. Obviously, there are some environmental benefits to increasing the cost of fuel.
On the other side, increasing petrol effect on poor and middle families and it is not a viable solution. because of increasing petrol price, they forced to use public transport, while at the same time rich people who own most of the cars will continue to drive their personal vehicles. In addition, increasing cost of the fuel has essential effect on commodities and getting more expensive that will be another blow for poor people. The better solution is to improve the infrastructure. Roads should be widened and more flyovers and underpass should be built. The responsibility of he government is encourage the businesses to move their offices either to suburbs or rural areas as this measure will help to decongest cities.
As a result, raising the cost of petrol might help to some extent, but it is not a viable solution as its downsides outweigh the advantages. I think with improve the infrastructure in cites and developing smaller towns are more effective ways to decongest cities and solve traffic problem.
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA are in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- the graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predications for 2030 and 2040
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 73
- The maps below shown an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 191, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... but also, the weather getting cleaner. Because people have more tendency to use public...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Because
...milies and it is not a viable solution. because of increasing petrol price, they forced...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 580, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'of the government'?
Suggestion: of the government
...ass should be built. The responsibility of he government is encourage the businesses to move the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 600, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
... The responsibility of he government is encourage the businesses to move their offices ei...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, i think, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02545454545 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80713141425 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9376096008 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204155748533 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621965560653 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042495938335 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121958115954 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0337589561034 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.