increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
to what extent do you agree or disagree?
what other measure do you think might be effective?
The growth of traffic has become one most of important problems in majority countries. In my opinion although with increasing the petrol price can reduce the traffic and pollution, there are other practical solutions.
Many governments for reducing traffic raises the fuels price. With increasing the price people have more tendency to use public transportation which causes reduce the pollution such as air pollution and noises. Moreover, if people use their own car not only might increase the number of vehicles that causes of traffic but also, it makes increase the air pollution. This method is very common among governments.
To tackle this problem there are some other measures to be taken. Municipal should improve the roads conditions including their widths that leads to reduce traffic and ban the old vehicles which emit pollution. Another point is to increases improve the services of public transportation. Express trains is one of the best public transportations which save the people time. It is very important to present a good and suitable public transport facility that people can manage their time. With this method the both problems can be solve. In addition, the authorities can set rules for rush hour that if people use their private cars fine them, it makes them to feel fair and don’t use their car in this time. Finally, people who work in out of city should have schedule and a good timetable which they left work in calm hour.
In conclusion, although increasing the price can have effect on reduce traffic and pollution, there are many different effective ways which can replace it.
- The charts below show the average percentage in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean Island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same to periods Summariz 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, there are other practical solutions. Many governments for reducing traffic ra...
^^^
Line 4, column 105, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...reduce traffic and pollution, there are many different effective ways which can replace it. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, moreover, so, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08646616541 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5811302934 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.2743665407 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153056405029 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600143569091 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515154436492 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117093772093 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311040336575 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.