Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
Indeed, growing traffic density and pollution have become alarming issues in the contemporary world. It is suggested that the price of petrol / oil should be hiked. In my opinion, this is not a very effective method and alternative steps should be taken to address these issues.
On the one hand, raising / hiking / increasing the cost of petrol would encourage travellers to adopt other cost-effective means of transportation such as public transit and cycles. If petrol is unaffordable, people are less likely to use their private vehicles frequently. Along with number of private vehicles plying on the roads, the level of obnoxious gases exhausted by them will also reduce / plummet, leading to cleaner air. Obviously, there are some environmental benefits to increasing the cost of fuel.
On the other hand, this is not a viable solution because it will only affect the poor and middle class people. If petrol becomes unaffordable, they will be forced to use public transport. At the same time, rich people who own most of the cars will continue to drive their personal vehicles. Raising the cost of fuel will also make essential commodities more expensive and that will be another blow for poor people. In my opinion, a better solution is to improve the infrastructure. Roads should be widened and more flyovers should be built. The government should also encourage businesses to move their offices to the suburbs or rural areas as this measure will help to decongest cities.
In conclusion, raising the cost of petrol might help to some extent, but it is not a viable solution as its downsides outweigh the advantages. In my opinion, improving the road infrastructure in cities and developing smaller towns are more effective ways to decongest cities and solve traffic problems.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The two maps below show road access to city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 70
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 84
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- the graph gives information about male and female gym membership between 1980 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13356164384 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82175097754 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571917808219 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.721874867 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6875 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6875 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145584867647 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479460678196 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.035754187387 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970624838868 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350109151248 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.