Individuals can do nothing the environment, only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The issue of who must take the responsibility for protecting the environment has aroused crowd discussion. While a multitude of people suggest that solely the governments and big firms can make huge contribution, others firmly opine that the role of individuals should be, by no means, overlooked. Personally, I believe that such a duty should be equally devided between two parties for the sake of humankind.
On the one hand, there are sufficient grounds to argue that the authorities and big corporations should be in charge of environment control. First of all, it is clear that the state have huge power and resources allocated for preserving the environment, thereby becoming the outstanding contributing factor in the enhancement of our habitat in large scale. For example, the governments have the legal right to enact polices to raise awareness of public to hold hands to tackle this pressing issue. Furthermore, large enterprises also play a vital role in the process of managing the environment. Indeed, they have invented various environmentally-friendly products, like rice straws, degradable shopping bags or cars that run on alternative energy, which are incentives for many people to follow green lifestyle. By doing this, people's consuming habits can be positively improved, resulting in a greener living habitat.
On the other hand, that is not to say that each individual can not be the contributor. In fact, ordinary people, by doing tiny things in their daily life, such as putting trash in the right place, recycling clothes or using energy-efficient household items, can help reduce their carbon-footprint. This, in turn, creates significant changes. Besides, a larger proportion of citizen in numerous countries, including Vietnam, has shifted toward using public transports and bicycles, which minimizes a tremendous amount of carbon dioxide and enhances the air quality.
All in all, I would reaffirm that the governments, large companies, and everyone regardless of sex, age, religion should shoulder the responsibility of protecting our surroundings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between manager and workers is important other people say that other factors are more important What is your opinion 67
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 61
- Individuals can do nothing the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to enact polices to raise awareness of public to hold hands to tackle this pres...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, while, for example, in fact, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5046728972 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26403346509 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647975077882 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8666871641 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.214285714 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9285714286 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149484990258 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046976647151 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491948804025 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785411409673 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315098157261 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.