Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Environment has become the hot topic for the recent years and pollution has been threatening our planet also our daily lives. In order to prevent our earth from being contaminated, some people assume that just only governments, authorities and famous companies can solve the problems and individuals are incapable of saving the environment. Personally, I partly disagree with this statement.
On the one hand, I agree that governments and gigantic firms, even authorities can change the situation. In actual fact, for the firms, they can protect the Earth by reduce the amount of toxic gases which cause the global warming and greenhouse effect such as methane, carbon dioxide, etc. or the waste. Furthermore, factories should be equipped the waste solving system in order to prevent pollution. Governments and authorities play a significant role in making the difference. For instance, they need to implement new policies and strict laws to save the environment, planting trees, designating large areas for forest.
On the other hand, I disagree with the statements that people can not do anything to protect the Earth.
In actual fact, all of us can prevent our planet form pollution. Individuals should do some simple activities like put the litter into the waste basket, do not littering, sort the kinds of garbage, reuse, reduce and recycle the plastic, metal and glass wastes. Although these activities are easy to do and some people think they are useless, these ones affect strongly to our lives. Human beings are going to be extinct if we keep littering and polluting the environment.
In summary, I disagree partly with the mentioned statement and I believe that all of us are capable of doing many great and meaningful things in order to keep our Earth being clean. Saving the environment means saving our lives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree that improvements in technology reduce the role of Olympic Games 62
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 73
- The charts below show the average wages of managerial and general staff and the profits of the company TRN between 2000 and 2003 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 39
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 108, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...uthorities can change the situation. In actual fact, for the firms, they can protect the Ea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: ACTUAL_EXPERIENCE[1]
Message: Use simply 'fact'.
Suggestion: fact
...t do anything to protect the Earth. In actual fact, all of us can prevent our planet form ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 342, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...and some people think they are useless, these ones affect strongly to our lives. Human bei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, so, as for, for instance, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13422818792 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72236804636 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570469798658 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3776329762 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4375 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185607362258 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577909967177 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443395694472 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106933585458 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340414608734 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.