The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph gives the information about the number of people receiving the inquiry questions in the first six months in the year of 2014 by some specific ways.

It can be observed that the number of people who had an interview from the Tourist Office’s staffs grew up dramatically during the survey period from around 400 to approximate 1900. Whereas, the figures of people surveyed by letter or email has a downward trend. The number of people had dropped sharply for 3 months before decreasing gradually for the first 3 months in the survey. By the end of the survey time, the number of inquired people by mail or letter had maintained at below 400.

In contrast, starting at about 900, the figures of people interviewed on telephone declined slightly to 800 before increasing noticeable on March. The figure had stood at 1000 for a month, then increased substantially up to 1400. The number of surveyed people via telephone kept rising and at the end of the survey, this number achieved at approximate 1600.

In general, there was an up-ward trend for the number of people who received the enquires via telephone and in person. Meanwhile, that of people who were interview by letter or mail decline noticeably during the survey.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-27 Maleeha 67 view
2019-12-15 KIM JINUK 56 view
2019-11-15 SandraWolfie 84 view
2019-08-26 Nguyễn Hương Giang 78 view
2019-08-26 Minhthuminhthumingthu 67 view
Essays by user Selfstudy :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, then, whereas, while, in contrast, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90094339623 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64505742181 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528301886792 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2336780402 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.9 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115809793443 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0521627400554 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534551629229 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0881790160209 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062159137077 0.0819641961636 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.