Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and
large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
In current times, as environmental problems are the worldwide topic, some people claim that government and large companies should take responsible of protecting surrounding environment. Personally, I disagree with the above viewpoint, and also believe that both individuals and the cabinet have to enhance the environment together.
To begin with, people in society need to be constantly concerned the awareness of taking care and paying attention to the environment. Especially city dwellers, who are likely to behave badly towards trees, flowers, mountains and atmosphere on a regular and long-term basis. Walking through the streets outside, we will see trash littering carelessly, as well as the exhaust fumes and the excessive emission of carbon dioxide from busy means of transports moving on the roads. As a result, the difference of a greener environment originates in taking actions of residents, much as we are now being affected in the public environment. Folks must be conscious and start doing nice things such as plant trees, stop employing plastic bags, cycling, propagate others, and so on. Little by little, human beings can create a tremeduous difference, which bring them the quality of life and provide mental benefits for themselves.
Nevertheless, in order to be even more effectively, big corporations and government should also participate in this task. Strict laws, punishments as well as good education have to be proceeded from government's actions. Specifically speaking, regarding children, it is significant to take the environment into curriculum and completely guide them how to treat it right. Moreover, companies should establish campaigns or movements for employees to understand the importance of environment, as well as for those who are still have no idea about defending a green of the Earth.
In summary, I am of opinion that the cabinet and people have to tackle the environmental issues together so that they would be able to acquire a better life and decrease the risk of health-damaging diseases
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-04 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
2019-08-30 | Hafween | 89 | view |
2019-07-09 | pravanthbabu | 89 | view |
2019-05-21 | muraliv | 67 | view |
2019-05-12 | Naive Dinosaur | 67 | view |
- It is better for students at university to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents. What are the advantages and disadvantages of living far from home? 84
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 56
- Your office is full of plants and no one is watering them on regular basis. To whom this task should be assigned? Boss' s personal assistant or the whole team? Discuss. 60
- The advantages of living in a small town 150 words 83
- Some people believe that radio is the best way to get news while others think that TV is better for this purpose. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plastic bags, cycling, propagate others, and so on. Little by little, human being...
^^
Line 5, column 364, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rights'?
Suggestion: rights
...d completely guide them how to treat it right. Moreover, companies should establish c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ent, as well as for those who are still have no idea about defending a green of the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, well, as for, in summary, such as, as a result, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42006269592 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08365175204 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64263322884 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4093638306 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112516924464 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346256185917 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0296789593045 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0621949204317 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286908812622 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.