Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and big companies can make a difference to what extent do you agree or disagree
Some people are of the opinion that the improvement of the environment depend only on big organizations and the authorities instead of people. Although big changes are mainly generated by the mentioned parties, I believe that each person can still make contribution.
It is true to say environment issues are mostly fixed by governments and large companies, thanks for important rules and wide scale campaigns. In a simple way, governments notice harmful action and put them under legal control. For example, Singapore is a typical model for positive legacy effects, with its fame for being the cleanest city in the world since people will receive heavy fine once they throw trash on the street. another factor is massive business groups , as they hold the key to define the quality of the surrounding habitat. Industrial companies are among the majority that pollutes the environment, therefore, if those groups can reduce the amount of waste in the same way as Honda company did, or apply environmental friendly system to their factories just like Mitsubishi.
However, I would like to argue that the success to change the environment lies in every person. Each family can change daily habits such as saving electricity, growing trees, using pedestrian areas instead of motored vehicles... "Earth Day" in Vietnam - a popular annual project is a strong prove that small impacts can bring great influences and the big picture will be different in total, as with just 1 hour every city household light off, there is normally saved energy for a whole school in one month. Secondly, people are advantages of social network power. positive messages and actions can be effectively sent from one to another in the society thanks to Facebook, twitter and a variety form of SNS nowadays. By this, important awareness is raised and necessary trends are encouraged.
In conclusion, governments and large organizations play a key role to solve environmental problems, but it also requires supports from people in all countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-04-07 | islam.elhadidy2018@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-02 | llethuhang1605 | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Mandeep kaur khalsa | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | Mandeep kaur khalsa | 56 | view |
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and big companies can make a difference to what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The use of mobile phone is as anti social as smoking Since smoking is banned in certain places using mobile phone should be banned as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only government and large companies make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 144, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a simple way" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...portant rules and wide scale campaigns. In a simple way, governments notice harmful action and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...ne once they throw trash on the street. another factor is massive business groups , as ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nother factor is massive business groups , as they hold the key to define the qual...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
... - a popular annual project is a strong prove that small impacts can bring great infl...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 575, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Positive
...are advantages of social network power. positive messages and actions can be effectively...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 804, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed and necessary trends are encouraged. In conclusion, governments and large org...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 161, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... supports from people in all countries.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, it is true, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22629969419 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81787672324 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651376146789 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.6757121855 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165769569489 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486077858668 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437926442385 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986249217885 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0608633886889 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.