Inspite of advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hunger. why is this case?. what can be done for this problem.
Food plays a significant role in people and animals survival. Living organisms can not live without food. Agriculture is a major source of food production. Nowadays many advanced techniques are used in agriculture to increase production. Despite, it is not enough for all the people living in the world.
First and foremost thing to consider is the population. World population keeps on increasing in each and every decades. As the demand for land to live increases people tend to destroy the agriculture lands and forest to construct buildings to live and for other purposes. So as the consequence of this, an only small portion of land is used for agriculture. We are trying to use the advanced techniques in the small portion of land alone. So, it is not enough for every people living around the world. Money is the other thing need to consider. Everyone needs money to buy agriculture products. Due to the unemployment rate in developing and developed countries, a few people are not able to afford these products.
However, there will be a solution to every problem. Framers in rural areas should also be educated to use advanced techniques efficiently to increase the productivity of agriculture products. If people are educated and followed the new technique such as a rooftop garden will also increase productivity in a huge rate. Everyone can get their food without paying for the products. With less investment, they can get a huge benefit. There are a plethora of varieties of crop and plants that can be cultivated easily. The government should gather all this information and properly educated the people about the type of crop which suits their soil, method of irrigation should be followed, etc.
To recapitulate it is not only the duty of the government but also people should also actively participate in this and they should follow this. To balance the population and food each and every individual should take a step towards producing the food and also reduction of food wastage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-01 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | kalkipriya Muruganantham | 56 | view |
- Many businesses in the world today are run by family members Do the advantages of family run businesses outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your experiences or knowledge 58
- Adults do less exercise nowadays. Some think that people can be encouraged to live healthy lives through sporting events such as the Olympics or the World Cup. Others think that there are better ways to encourage adults for exercise. Discuss both views an 56
- Some people feel that entertainers such as film stars, pop musicians or sports stars are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of job should be highly paid?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your o 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
- The graphs below show the numbers of male and female workers in 1975 and 1995 in several employment sectors of the Republic of Freedonia.Write a report for a university teacher describing the information shown. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 691, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d of irrigation should be followed, etc. To recapitulate it is not only the duty ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04191616766 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80443046264 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.482035928144 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0821462737 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.2173913043 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5217391304 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.82608695652 7.06120827912 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 3.4128256513 381% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214099331136 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613886054716 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506112504252 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124372600948 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0292431056365 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.