In the modern world, it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development?
In recent years, there has been a growing trend towards using social platforms for some daily activities such as shopping, working, and communicating. While some may worry that this trend may have a negative effect on human social interaction, I believe that its benefits are far more significant.
On the one hand, the disadvantages of using public platforms are significant. Firstly, if people are addicted to social media, they may lack interaction with humans as they may find it difficult to communicate with others. For example, people who spend too much time on social platforms may find it inferiority complex when talking directly with their friends or colleges. Secondly, addiction to communicability application may lead to some illness in both mental and physical conditions. For instance, spending too many hours on the internet may cause users a headache or eye fatigue. As a result, users may lead a sedentary lifestyle if they continue to spend their leisure time inappropriately.
Nevertheless, these issues can generally be resolved, and there are definite rewards to social platforms. The most glaring virtue is that social applications can reduce the physical distance by allowing users to connect with others online. The fact is there are numerous social applications are created to serve this purpose. As a result, the efficiency of working can be improved as meetings can be established at home through virtual calling applications such as zoom and google meet. Another clear benefit is that social-trading platforms help limit some dangerous diseases as Covid19-pandemic happened recently. Clearly, there is a lot to be gained from social applications.
In conclusion, although online communicating services can negatively affect people's lifestyle, it brings various advantages for users. In my view, the potential benefits more than makeup for many disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48630136986 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12989717615 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.828415563 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104959309995 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0334125388606 0.084324248473 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399089122331 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589425917455 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0242277379466 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.