Investment in local amenities such as leisure centres is the best way for the government to foster a good community spirit.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Investing in local amenities is one of the implementations to build up a good community spirit. By growing up population, people have figured out many different ways for us to get together. Other than local amenities, I believe there are more effective ways to achieve the goal.
Although local amenities such as public swimming pool or leisure complexes can be quite expensive for a government, some people still prefer going to these place to hang out with others. They may make new friends in a wide range of ages or with same hobbies within the community. Another way to foster a good spirit in a community can be public facilities. Governments should consider to build some facilities like libraries and parks where people can spend their leisure time or relax.
If building amenities and facilities spends too much money, holding a activity may be a cheaper way. For instance, having a tennis class on weekends, or some other special activities that related to local culture. These activities won’t result in a huge expenditure, and the cohesion can possibly be built up within community. On the other hand, although it could take more effort on planning, there is no need for governments to spend on an extra money afterwards like spending money on maintaining amenities or facilities.
There are many implementations in terms of fostering a good spirt in community. In my opinion, they all have their own pros and cons, and those factors are needed to be concerned by the governments.
- Globalization is creating a world of one culture and destroying national identity To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 56
- In many societies in the world the population is ageing rapidly and this is leading to an unsustainable increase in the cost of public healthcare A nation s population should pay for their healthcare provision in the future 56
- The position of women has changed a great deal in many societies over the past 50 years But these societies cannot claim to have achieved gender equality To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The world today is a safer place than it was a hundred years ago and governments should stop spending large amounts of money on their armed forces 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
... up population, people have figured out many different ways for us to get together. Other than...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cilities spends too much money, holding a activity may be a cheaper way. For inst...
^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...in a huge expenditure, and the cohesion can possibly be built up within community. On the ot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, still, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1253.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99203187251 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84613327089 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597609561753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3151882744 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3846153846 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217264995252 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826297941602 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609149961964 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129062390118 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507860711906 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.