It is believed that everyone should become vegetarian. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a widely-held view among people about whether a vegetarian diet should be followed by everyone. Although becoming vegetarians might have some beneficial impacts, I still believe that it is by no means appropriate for everybody to be a vegetarian.
On the one hand, there are both health and social factors that account for the proliferation of vegetarianism. First, it is no doubt true that a diet containing a high quantity of vegetables is rich in all fundamental vitamins and minerals needed to promote health. This would undeniably act as a stimulus to build up immune systems as well as to avoid several chronic illnesses, facilitating to increase in average life expectancy. Second, recent research indicated that along with the explosion of the human population, food production is claimed that accounts for a significant role in increasing carbon emissions and reducing biodiversity. Therefore, if people were going vegetarian, the decreased pressure on food production would be a contributor to lessen the devastating impact on the environment.
However, the opinion that everyone turns to vegetarian can be considered as an impractical aspiration for several rationales. The strongest argument is that unless vegetarians were fully equipped with substantial knowledge pertaining to nutrition, their daily meal could be not properly balanced, lacking essential macro and micronutrients. This would certainly trigger long-term repercussions that create health implications. Besides, vegetarians have to rely on diet supplements regularly to provide integral nutrients which cost intolerably high. Thus, it would be difficult for everyone to be able to afford those exorbitant supplements.
In conclusion, while I agree that turning to a vegetarian diet might possibly gain tremendous benefits, I would argue that this plant-based dietary choice is not applicable to all people.
- Nowadays genetically modified food is widespread all over the world While proponents of GM crops ensure that these foods are safe for human consumption and help to increase food supplies others argue that their effects on health have not been studied long 89
- More and more people are no longer read newspaper or watch TV programs to get news They get news from about the world through the internet Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Governments should make laws about people s nutrition and food choice Others argue that it is their choice Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Around the world many animal species become extinct Some people believe that countries and individuals must try to solve this problem Others believe that concentrating on problems of human beings is more important than those concerning species Discuss bot 84
- Some people feel that manufactures and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce to amount of packaging of goods While other argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packing Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'might', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: might; possibly
...agree that turning to a vegetarian diet might possibly gain tremendous benefits, I would argue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'might'.
Suggestion: might
...agree that turning to a vegetarian diet might possibly gain tremendous benefits, I would argue...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63636363636 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25688743452 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65034965035 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0452196872 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131131281756 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044155820486 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474676353605 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875008189903 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584803879636 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.