It is believed that young people are more interested in international pop singers and movie stars then in history and historical people.why is this?
Some people believe that youngsters know more about international pop singers and movie stars and not being interested in knowing the important historical figures of their countries. The reason for this phenomenon is to be found in the media market and the way these personalities are over-shared and always in the spotlight, while, for example in schools, no accent is put on the importance of our countries' history. Children should be stimulated with fun experiences and tells from the past to make their interest in historical important people grow.
Today, young people give a lot of attention to fashion, hairstyles, clothes, and trends. And who represents better these different fields than a pop star or a movie star? It is the main reason so much publicity and visibility is given to famous people. Since they are looked up to by young kids who are looking for models to refer to, the media stress the importance of "looking just like them" and knowing every detail of their life. The feeling of being inside of their idol's lives can be rewarding and fascinating. Those modern public figures are always impeccable, living their best life, and kids can dream while singing their songs or watching their movies.
For some people, though, this growing interest in modern important people is drawing the attention away from more relevant historical figures. Some of them have, in fact, caused revolutions and won wars. Those are the role models kids should look up to, people full of motivation and values to teach. In order to give historical figures the recognition they deserve and stimulate kids to learn history with passion, fun learning experiences should be organized by teachers and city administrations. This way, young people can learn more about their countries' history while playing and enjoying their time.
Considering that, sometimes, learning facts in class can be boring and kids can be distracted easily, investments in public teaching fairs could raise awareness on the importance of never forgetting our roots.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17168674699 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71606424961 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557228915663 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8221763464 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.466666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.73333333333 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246253730617 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086507571956 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1014393063 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140490839838 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097947123909 0.056905535591 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.