The maps show the village park 10 years ago and the village car park now.
The maps illustrate the development of the village park over a 10 years span. Overall, it can be seen that some changes have been made, from the size of pre-existing features which got expanded, to the construction of new amenities.
At the present time, the tennis court has been doubled in size, going from having 2 courts to the opening of 4 in total. The car park on the left, that 10 years ago could fit 20 people, is now suitable for 50, while the football pitch was expanded and moved a little lower from where it used to be.
The children's play area has been renewed over time, with the construction of two separated areas now called The children's park and The children's soft play area. Opposite to the tennis court, at the very bottom of the village park, where once was a little pond, now a boating lake can be found, next to the newly built cafè. This structure, together with the recently built toilets, takes the place of the woods that once used to be there, to the bottom right of the park.
Last but not least, two new features have been added from scratch, the brand new picnic area situated on the bottom left, and cycle path that runs around the perimeter of the village park.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 129, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'parks'.
Suggestion: parks
...s to the opening of 4 in total. The car park on the left, that 10 years ago could fi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 980.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45454545455 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21547897924 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568181818182 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.9232061015 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.75 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297394283581 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138622138395 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137947760151 0.0843802449381 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170847723095 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355948654926 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.