It is better for students at university to live far away from home than to live at home with their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
These days, whether university pupils should live on their own or with their family is a topic of debate. In my opinion, while I agree that living with parents is worthwhile in some ways, I still believe that having a free life brings much more benefits to the students themselves.
On the one hand, the idea of sharing a living with parents is reasonable to some extent. First, living together under the same roof helps create a stronger bond between two generations. Through daily activities such as cooking and having meals, watching television or chatting, both parents and children can get to understand more about each other, thus becoming more attached and closer. Moreover, living at home helps students to be more ensured about their parents as they get older. In some emergency cases, for example, an unexpected health problem, they are able to be there to take care of their parents and take them to the hospital if necessary.
On the other hand, the students themselves will benefit more from living out. First, this provides them with various living skills, which will be useful in their later life. When they move out to live alone, they have to fend for themselves without their parents’ assistance. Therefore, they will be gradually accustomed to doing household chores skills such as cooking and doing the washing up and problem solving skill when something unpredictably happens. Furthermore, living on their own makes them become financially independent of their parents. They are aware that they cannot turn to their parents whenever they run out of money. As a result, they will have to find a job to earn a living, which at the same time, helps them to understand and treasure the value of money. Since then, they many get into a positive habit of saving money for emergency situations and even their future plans.
To conclude, while living with parents may brings university students a sense of attachment and security, I believe that living a self-control life will turn these students into more versatile and independent people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-17 | Khanhu010101 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-17 | Khanhu010101 | 67 | view |
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant http testbig com sites default files styles max 650x650 public 15134677 555072 10
- Many young people leave school with negative attitudes towards learning Why What can be done to encourage a positive attitude to learning in young people 84
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and includ 61
- Some people believe that a college or university education should be available to all students Others believe that higher education should be available only to good students Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 798, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun get seems to be countable; consider using: 'many gets'.
Suggestion: many gets
...re the value of money. Since then, they many get into a positive habit of saving money f...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00581395349 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53447697825 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5279055762 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.1875 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308943249226 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111610136163 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703302877454 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204809392511 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206660571499 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.