It is often believed that children ought to accurately differentiate between what is right from what is wrong when they are relatively young and by punishing them helps to distinguish this habit. In my opinion, I cpmpletely disagree because this is not the most effective method of punishing a child, and better ways to discipline a child in place of punishment.
There are several reasons why penalizing a child does not help in distinguishing between a practical sense of right and wrong. Firstly, it instils fear and fierce resentment in them. This is because their emotional brain is however developing, therefore, they are incapable to comprehend why they are required to behave in a certain way. Another reason is child discipline can modify their behaviour. Take, for example, a child who is punished in ways, such as nagging, spanking, yelling or beating, always often end up bullying other children or become a victim of bullies. They usually misinterpret this supposedly corrective parental method as an appropriate and acceptable disciplinary measure. Thus, physical punishment causes more harm than good to toddlers and preschoolers.
Furthermore, many efficient and non-violent pedagogical techniques can be adopted to discipline children to behave in their best. For instance, not only parents but also teachers should make use of effective methods such as positive reinforcement, effusive praise, non-coercive discipline and contingent encouragement in teaching children good manners. It involves praising and encouraging them, providing a treat, and praising to reward them for their behaviour. This will encourage children feel good about their choices, which will inspire them to increase the acts that bring rewards. Consequently, it makes them to acquire helpful habits that will filter through adulthood and will prove beneficial throughout life.
In conclusion, children who receive corporal punishment are victims of bullies and mental disorders. Parents and teachers should serve as role models and also educate children to possess good behaviour.
- Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar which causes many health problems Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar Do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answer and inclu 67
- The charts show the qualities employers and employees think are important in job seekers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp 89
- Some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled 83
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Is it a positive or negative development 39
- Some people think that it is better for a country s economy for people to spend money while others believe that it would be better for people to save money Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59810126582 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99909689713 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1315062484 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258748612302 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772436115041 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636314521984 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165748802094 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780569740033 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59810126582 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99909689713 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613924050633 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1315062484 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5625 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258748612302 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772436115041 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0636314521984 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165748802094 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780569740033 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.